Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jimplongo's avatar

The numbers are actually worse than they appear, in that LinkedIn profiles are predominantly generated by knowledge workers; there are very few wage earners who create profiles. I would love to see a follow-up analysis to take this fact into account.

Pawel Adrjan's avatar

What is your denominator, Toby? Is it people aged 15-64 who are in the labour force, as the note at the end suggests? Many people who are not in the labour force (studying, ill, retired) will also have LinkedIn accounts, so I wonder if that should be added to the list of reasons why your measure of penetration is >100% in some countries.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?